IRMA Analysis (2008)

Executive Summary:

This year's IRMA paper is an exact replica of last year (2007) with respect to the pattern and level of the questions. The two-hour long paper comprised 200 questions distributed over four sections. Wrong answers carried negative marks equivalent to one-fourth of the marks allotted to the question.

The following is a synopsis on how this paper could have been attempted and what is the desired score to receive a call from IRMA:

S. No.

Sections

No. Of questions

Ideal time to be allotted

Sectional attempts (Average)

Sectional scores (Average)

1

English comprehension

40

30

30

23

2

Quantitative ability (QA & DI)

50

40

34

26

3

Analytical reasoning

50

30

30

25

4

Issues of social concern

60

20

30

16

5

Total

200

120

124+

90+

Section I: English

EU (20 Q) + RC (20 Q)

Sr. No. Topic No. Of Qs Remarks
1 Cloze Passage 1 10 Easy-Medium level of difficulty.
2 Antonyms on Passage 1 3 Easy-Medium level
3 RC Inference based questions on Passage 1 2 Easy
4 RC Passage 1 and 2 18 Moderately Difficult
5 Antonyms on Passage 2 5 Easy -Medium level
6 Synonyms on passage 2 2 Easy-Medium level

The English Section had two main parts to it. Two passages --- which had the following configuration:

Passage 1: A short passage of roughly 250 words hovering around Agricultural credit and finance. Easy to read and having 10 Cloze qs, 3 questions on antonyms and 2 Inference based RC questions. The cloze questions were easy. 2-3 of them had close choices. The 3 questions on antonyms were of moderate level of difficulty. The RC Inference questions were easy.

Passage 2: A long passage of roughly 1200-1300 words on the relevance of Ranga - the economists' theories as regards the Indian Agricultural scene. It had around 5 fact based questions and 13 inference based questions of various types. It also had 5 questions on synonyms and 2 questions on antonyms on words highlighted in bold in the passage.

The Inference based questions were of different types and were of moderately difficult levels. The fact based questions were easy. The questions on Synonyms and antonyms were easy and were a must attempt.

Strategy: There could have been two types of strategy adoption here.

A. Attempt the time consuming RC Passage 2 and attempt the Easy RC questions and words.
    Then go for the word based questions of passage 1.

B. Attempt Passage 1 fully and then go for the word based questions of Passage 2.

All in all, it was a moderate English section. Ideally 28-30 questions could have been attempted in the given time period, leading to a score of
18-20.

Section II: Quantitative Ability (QA & DI)

 

S. No.

Topic

No. of questions

Remarks

1

Simplification (Calculation)

8

Average difficulty level

2

DI

20

Two sets of tables (easy), one line chart (easy) & one multiple bar graph (easy)

3

Percentage

2

Easy

4

Ratio

2

Easy

5

SI/CI

2

One easy & one moderately difficult

6

Profit & Loss

1

Easy

7

Time & Work

1

Easy

8

P&C

2

Easy

9

Probability

2

Moderate

10

Data Sufficiency

5

Easy

11

Set Theory

5

Easy to Moderate

 

 Although easy to solve, this section put a premium on calculation.

Few Sample questions

Q.1 1/3 of 719 is by what value greater than 1/9 of 405?

Q.2 63% of 6771 is approximately equal to which of the following values

Q.3 (89.44)2 =

Q.4 497 x ? = 341 x 1973

Q.5 The ratio of ages of a brother and a sister is 11:7. After 8 years, the ratio of their ages is 15/11. What is the difference of their current ages?

DI SET

Following is the list of number of students who passed and failed in their classes in the respective years.


Q.6 What is the average of all the students who passed in the class VIII over the given years?

Q.7 What is the ratio of passed students to that of failed students in class IX?

Q.8 What is the percentage of students passed in the class VIII?

Q.9 Which year has the maximum number of failed students among the given years?

Q.10 which class has the maximum number of passed students over the given years?

Section III: Analytical Reasoning

 

The character of this section is completely changed as compared to last year. This year's paper witnessed much more refined and structured questions in verbal logic and critical reasoning.

A total of 50 questions were asked from the following segments:

 

  1. Statement – Consequence Type : (5 Questions) These five questions seemed easy but there were ambiguity involved in couple of questions. May be two questions could have been attempted.
    The level of difficulty was moderate to easy.
  1. AR Caselet : The caselet question was based on a standard data mapping. According to the question, there were 8 people named P, Q, R, S, T, V, W and Z specializing in one of the subjects Marketing, HR or Finance. Each of them likes one particular sport among mentioned 8 sports. 5 questions were asked. This was moderately difficult.
  1. Odd Man Out : (5 questions) five individual questions on varied topic. Easy to attempt.
  1. Strong and Weak Argument :(5 questions) One statement was provided and it was followed by two arguments. One was asked to figure out the strong argument(s) from the given options. The level of difficulty was moderate. May be 2 to 3 attempts were possible.
  1. Data Sufficiency : (5 questions) Analytical data was given and standard DS format were used.
  1. Implicit Assumptions : (5 questions) A statement followed by two assumptions was provided and aspirants were to identify implicit assumptions. Moderately difficult.
  1. Logical Actions : (5 questions) Each question talked about some situations and two likely course of actions were given. Aspirants were to identify the most logical course of action which 'follows' the situation. The level of difficulty was high.
  1. Decision Making : (10 questions) Different conditions were given regarding eligibility of loan for a farmer. Various cases were provided and one was asked whether or not the case would be granted the loan or sent for some other treatment. Questions were straight and on the easier side.
  2. Definitely True – Definitely False : (5 Questions) Questions were ambiguous and at the most 3 questions should have been attempted.

Section IV: Issues of Social Concern

Questions were mainly asked from Indian agriculture, Indian economy, various schemes of social development etc. This section was quite difficult to solve with many of the questions being based on comprehensive understanding of the economic and social development.

Few Sample Questions

Q.1 which of the following is not green house gas?

1) Methane 2) Carbon Dioxide 3) Carbon Monoxide 4) Nitrogen Dioxide 5) Hydro-chloro-dioxide

Q.2 which of the following diseases IS not under surveillance target of government of India?

1) Tuberculosis 2) Typhoid 3) Cholera 4) Cancer 5) Measles

Q.3 what is the GDP growth for Agriculture of India for the year 2006-2007?

1) 4.55% 2) 5% 3) 3.5% 4)3% 5)None of these

Useful Information about IRMA:

Total number of Applications

11000 (Approx.)

Total number of seats

95 (Approx.)

Approximate total Fees for two years of (PRM)

2.8 Lakhs (Approx.)

Average Placement for the year - 2008

6.13 Lakhs

Website:

https://www.irma.ac.in/admissions/admissions_faq.php

 

All the best!!
Career Launcher Team

Close