B-school Updates 
MBA News
Exam Notifications
Application Dates
Results
Analyses of Exams
Student Speak
Pegasus Events
 
 
 
  MAT September 2007 Analysis
   
   
   
MAT September 2007 Analysis
 
   
  MAT 2008 Analysis  
 

 

Overview:

MAT strikes again! It presented a  combination of jumbled up questions accompanied  with numerous challenges. Offering a high scoring section of Logical Reasoning, easy questions of  Quantitative Ability and Data Interpretation, and a moderately difficult Verbal Ability Section, the question paper, on an overall basis, provided sections that belonged to an average level of difficulty. Each section contained a few questions that were easily manageable and hence made the question paper quite scoring.

 

Executive Summary:

The basic sequence of section with possible attempts was as follows:


 
 
Section No. of Ques. Suggested Time
Possible Attempts
Possible Score

Reasoning

40

23

35

15 +

QA

40

22

35

17 +

DI and DS

40

24

35

18 +

G.A.

40

15

10

6 +

EU & RC

40

20

35

15 +

Total

200

99+

150

65+
(excluding GK)

*Note: The number of attempts and the score has been worked out on the basis of the experts’ insight on how the students would have taken the test and what score normally has been achieved by the students in past years in this level of paper.

 
     
 

SECTION I: LOGICAL REASONING

This has been the scoring area for many students in the recent MAT papers. This time there was a marginal jump in language based reasoning questions and hence it was a bit more complicated. Nevertheless, it was still easy. The questions can be broadly classified as:

These were mixed bag questions with broad breakup as under:

ANALYTICAL ANALYSIS

Type of question No. of Questions Level of Difficulty

Venn Diagram two set

7

Easy

Blood Relationship

2

Easy

Misc (single questions)

3

Easy

Input Output Flow chart

4

Average

AR Set

4

Difficult

LOGICAL REASONING

Type of question No. of Questions Level of Difficulty

Critical reasoning

4

Difficult

Course of Action

4

Difficult

Statement Arguments

4

Average

Statement Conclusions

4

Easy-Average

Statement Assumptions

4

Easy

Hence, about 23 questions from this section could have been attempted.
Assuming 75%+ accuracy, a score of 15+ was easily possible in 35 minutes.

 
     
 

SECTION II: QUANTITATIVE ABILITY

In this section students could easily enhance their scores. The all time favourite arithmetic was very prominent. The topic wise break up of the questions was as follows:

Type of question No. of Questions Level of Difficulty

Percentages

3

Easy-Average

Ratio & proportion, SI-CI

5

Easy

Averages

4

Easy

Time Speed Distance

6

Easy-Average

Time & Work

4

Easy-Average

Geometry

2

Average

Mensuration

4

Easy

Trigonometry

1

Easy

Clocks Calenders

4

Easy

Permutations and Probability

3

Average

Number System and Misc

4

Average


Assuming an accuracy of 80% and attempt of 22 questions, a score of 17+ is possible with a time spend of about 35 minutes.


 
     
 

SECTION III: DATA INTERPRETATION

This was an easier section as compared to the last 3 years'  MAT papers. The sets were either lengthy or difficult to interpret. The easy part was DS.

The summary was as under:

Type of question No. of Questions Level of Difficulty

Tables based set

9 (2 sets)

Average

Line chart

6 (2 sets)

Easy

Bar graph

7(2 sets)

Average-Difficult

Pie chart

8  (2 sets)

Average-Difficult

Combinational graph

4 ( 1 set)

Average-Difficult

Data Sufficiency

6

Easy

 
 
So the total attempt in this section could be about 22 questions and with about 80% accuracy one can score 18+ comfortably in this section.



 
 

SECTION IV: READING COMPREHENSION AND ENGLISH USAGE

This was again a section of moderate difficulty level. Let us take a closer look at this section!

Total no. of Questions: 40                    
No. of RC passages: 5
Questions from RC passages: 20
Questions from EU: 20

Analysis of English Usage and Reading Comprehension:

Type No. of Questions Level of Difficulty

Para jumbled

4

Average

Ward Analogies

4

Average

Sentence Corrections

4

Difficult

Idioms and phrases

4

Average

Fill in the blanks

4

Average

RC

20 (5 passages)

Two difficult,
Two Average and

Once again RC could have given a decent score. Also, vocabulary questions were very good. So, both these together would fetch you a great score.

An attempt of 20 questions with 75 % accuracy could have yielded a possible score of 15+ in 35 minutes.

SECTION V: GENERAL AWARENESS SECTION

There were 40 questions based on Current affairs, brands, punchlines & some fact based questions. In 10 minutes, a student could have attempted 15 questions and with 60 % accuracy; one could have got 9 marks in GK Section.

Overall analysis:

Expected Score (excluding GK) Expected percentile

80 +

99 percentile

75-80

95 percentile

68-75

90 percentile

With best wishes
Career Launcher Team

 
     
 

Analysis of Entrance Tests

2007 - 2008
NMAT

SNAP

JMET

MAT

IIFT

CAT

IRMA

2006 - 2007
XAT

FMS

MFC

CET

 
 
top