The 80% Accuracy Myth in CAT VARC (And Why is it Killing Your Score)

Why am I writing This?

A lot of VARC advice is lazy. It sounds smart because it comes wrapped in numbers.

Here is one you have probably heard: “Attempt fewer questions. Maintain 80% accuracy. You will get the score you want.”

And honestly, it is not completely wrong. You cannot be blindly marking answers. You are not going to get everything right. So yes, accuracy matters, and so let’s understand the 80% accuracy myth in CAT VARC.

But my problem is this: why 80%?

Where did that number come from? How did it become the number everyone keeps repeating?

It sounds like someone has done the math. They haven’t.

Let us take apart this lazy math of 80% accuracy.

The Logic of the Lazy 80% Accuracy Math

Let us see how this advice is usually built.

CAT VARC has 24 questions. Each correct answer gives you 3 marks. Each wrong MCQ costs you 1 mark. The four TITA questions have no negative marking.

Here comes the advice:
If you want 40+ marks, attempt around 18 questions at 80% accuracy.

Here comes the math:
80% of 18 is about 14 to 15 correct answers.
14 correct, 4 wrong: 42 minus 4 = 38
15 correct, 3 wrong: 45 minus 3 = 42

So far, so good. At 18 attempts and 80% accuracy, you are in the 40 marks zone.

The same logic is applied to a 30+ target.
Attempt 14 questions at 80% accuracy.

80% of 14 is about 11 correct answers.
11 correct, 3 wrong: 33 minus 3 = 30

From that math, here is what the advice concludes.

Premise: If you want 40+ marks, attempt 18 questions at 80% accuracy.
Logic: 18 attempts means you can leave 6 questions. Which means you can skip one whole RC.
Conclusion: To get 40+ marks, the strategy is to solve 3 RCs and 8 VA questions at 80% accuracy.

Premise: If you want 30+ marks, attempt 14 questions at 80% accuracy.
Logic: 14 attempts means you can leave 10 questions. Which means you can skip two whole RCs.
Conclusion: To get 30+ marks, the strategy is to solve 2 RCs and 8 VA questions at 80% accuracy.

Neat. Clean. Convincing.

And notice what the entire game now hinges on: that 80%.

One number. Assumed, not earned. And yet it is deciding how many RCs you attempt, how you prepare, and what you think you need to do to crack this section.

That is a lot of weight for a number nobody has seriously questioned.

Let us question it.

More On CAT VARC: 

Add Career Launcher as a Trusted Source   

What the Lazy 80% Accuracy Math Misses

Let us start with VA.

There are 8 VA questions: 2 Para Summary, 2 Sentence Placement, 2 Odd Sentence, 2 Para Jumble

Now, if someone says “80% accuracy in VA”, what does that even mean?

80% of 8 is 6.4.

So you are talking about 6 to 7 correct answers. That is 18 to 21 marks. That is not “good”. That is god-level.

Now look at how VA actually behaves.

The 4 MCQs: Para Summary and Sentence Placement (MCQs)
Possible scores: 12, 8, 4, 0, -4

To get 8 marks, you need 3 out of 4 correct. That is already awesome.

The 4 TITAs: Odd Sentence and Para Jumble (TITA)

Possible scores: 12, 9, 6, 3, 0

Getting 2 out of 4 correct gives you 6 marks. That itself is awesome.

So an awesome VA performance looks like:
8 (MCQs) + 6 (TITA) = 14 marks

In fact, even 12 marks in VA is a solid score.

Also read: CAT Daily dose tests for regular practice to ace CAT 2026

Now come to RC.

One RC has 4 questions.

Possible scores: 12, 8, 4, 0, -4

To get 8 marks, you need 3 out of 4 correct. In every RC, you will likely encounter one question that is a genuine toss-up. Getting 3 out of 4 is a victory!

So, maintaining an average of 8 marks per RC is not normal. It is an awesome performance.

So let us define what “awesome” actually looks like:

VA ≈ 12 marks

Each RC  ≈  8 marks

This is not conservative. This is a strong performance. Now, let us go back to the earlier assumptions.

Also read: Common CAT Mock Mistakes To Avoid | How To Approach CAT Mocks

Lazy math says:

3 RCs + 8 VA at 80% accuracy = 44 marks
2 RCs + 8 VA at 80% accuracy = 35 marks

Now replace that with realistic, awesome performance:
3 RCs + 8 VA = 8 × 3 + 12 = 36 marks
2 RCs +8 VA = 8 × 2 + 12 = 28 marks

That is the gap. And that gap is significant.

What This Actually Does to You

This is what happens to students.

You are told that 3 RCs and 8 VA should give you 40+.

You accept it. You even accept that you do not need to evaluate all 24 questions. The exam is in November, but you have already decided this now. Your preparation starts getting built around this assumption.

Then you write mocks.

You get scores in the late 20s. Early 30s. Once in a while, you touch 40.

But you think something is wrong.

You prepare more. You push harder.

But the problem is not effort. You are not aligned with the correct math!

Accuracy matters. Nobody is saying otherwise. But “maintain 80% accuracy” is not a strategy. It is a number that sounds precise and means very little once you sit down with an actual paper. You cannot build a plan on bad math and expect it to survive the exam.

This is the math you actually want to work with:

12+ marks from VA
8 marks average per RC

And mind you, even that is good performance.

Work with real numbers. Build your plan around what strong actually looks like. Not around a percentage that nobody ever questioned.

And here is the thing: to get there, you do not need to read faster, think faster, or build some next-level skill overnight. You just need to start with the right numbers in your head. That is the first shift.

The rest, we will get to. Stay with me.