Question Numbers : (22 to 24) The passage below is accompanied by a set of three questions. Choose the best answer to each question.
Do sports mega events like the summer Olympic Games benefit the host city economically? It depends,
but the prospects are less than rosy. The trick is converting...several billion dollars in operating costs
during the 17- day fiesta of the Games into a basis for long-term economic returns. These days, the
summer Olympic Games themselves generate total revenue of $4 billion to $5 billion, but the lion's share
of this goes to the International Olympics Committee, the National Olympics Committees and the
International Sports Federations. Any economic benefit would have to flow from the value of the Games as
an advertisement for the city, the new transportation and communications infrastructure that was created
for the Games, or the ongoing use of the new facilities.
Evidence suggests that the advertising effect is far from certain. The infrastructure benefit depends on the
initial condition of the city and the effectiveness of the planning. The facilities benefit is dubious at best for
buildings such as velodromes or natatoriums and problematic for 100,000-seat Olympic stadiums. The
latter require a conversion plan for future use, the former are usually doomed to near vacancy. Hosting the
summer Games generally requires 30-plus sports venues and dozens of training centers. Today, the Bird's
Nest in Beijing sits virtually empty, while the Olympic Stadium in Sydney costs some $30 million a year to
operate.
Part of the problem is that Olympics planning takes place in a frenzied and time-pressured atmosphere of
intense competition with the other prospective host cities - not optimal conditions for contemplating the
future shape of an urban landscape. Another part of the problem is that urban land is generally scarce and
growing scarcer. The new facilities often stand for decades or longer. Even if they have future use, are they
the best use of precious urban real estate?
Further, cities must consider the human cost. Residential areas often are razed and citizens relocated
(without adequate preparation or compensation). Life is made more hectic and congested. There are, after
all, other productive uses that can be made of vanishing fiscal resources.
The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author's position.
To me, a "classic" means precisely the opposite of what my predecessors understood: a work is
classical by reason of its resistance to contemporaneity and supposed universality, by reason of its
capacity to indicate human particularity and difference in that past epoch. The classic is not what
tells me about shared humanity-or, more truthfully put, what lets me recognize myself as already
present in the past, what nourishes in me the illusion that everything has been like me and has
existed only to prepare the way for me. Instead, the classic is what gives access to radically
different forms of human consciousness for any given generation of readers, and thereby expands
for them the range of possibilities of what it means to be a human being.
1. A classic is able to focus on the contemporary human condition and a unified experience of human consciousness.
2. A classical work seeks to resist particularity and temporal difference even as it focuses on a common humanity.
3. A classic is a work exploring the new, going beyond the universal, the contemporary, and the notion of a unified human consciousness.
4. A classic is a work that provides access to a universal experience of the human race as opposed to radically different forms of human consciousness.