Back Home
Persistent Timer

Reading Comprehension

Q.No: 1
Test Name : CAT 2019 Actual Paper Slot 1
Question Numbers (6 to 10): The passage below is accompanied by a set of five questions. Choose the best answer to each question.

In the past, credit for telling the tale of Aladdin has often gone to Antoine Galland . . . the first European translator of . . . Arabian Nights [which] started as a series of translations of an incomplete manuscript of a medieval Arabic story collection. . . But, though those tales were of medieval origin, Aladdin may be a more recent invention. Scholars have not found a manuscript of the story that predates the version published in 1712 by Galland, who wrote in his diary that he first heard the tale from a Syrian storyteller from Aleppo named Hanna Diyab . . .

Despite the fantastical elements of the story, scholars now think the main character may actually be based on a real person’s real experiences. . . . Though Galland never credited Diyab in his published translations of the Arabian Nights stories, Diyab wrote something of his own: a travelogue penned in the mid-18th century. In it, he recalls telling Galland the story of Aladdin [and] describes his own hard-knocks upbringing and the way he marveled at the extravagance of Versailles. The descriptions he uses were very similar to the descriptions of the lavish palace that ended up in Galland’s version of the Aladdin story. [Therefore, author Paulo Lemos] Horta believes that “Aladdin might be the young Arab Maronite from Aleppo, marveling at the jewels and riches of Versailles.” . . .

For 300 years, scholars thought that the rags-to-riches story of Aladdin might have been inspired by the plots of French fairy tales that came out around the same time, or that the story was invented in that 18th century period as a byproduct of French Orientalism, a fascination with stereotypical exotic Middle Eastern luxuries that was prevalent then. The idea that Diyab might have based it on his own life — the experiences of a Middle Eastern man encountering the French, not vice-versa — flips the script. [According to Horta,] “Diyab was ideally placed to embody the overlapping world of East and West, blending the storytelling traditions of his homeland with his youthful observations of the wonder of 18thcentury France.” . . .

To the scholars who study the tale, its narrative drama isn’t the only reason storytellers keep finding reason to return to Aladdin. It reflects not only “a history of the French and the Middle East, but also [a story about] Middle Easterners coming to Paris and that speaks to our world today,” as Horta puts it. “The day Diyab told the story of Aladdin to Galland, there were riots due to food shortages during the winter and spring of 1708 to 1709, and Diyab was sensitive to those people in a way that Galland is not. When you read this diary, you see this solidarity among the Arabs who were in Paris at the time. . . .
There is little in the writings of Galland that would suggest that he was capable of developing a character like Aladdin with sympathy, but Diyab’s memoir reveals a narrator adept at capturing the distinctive psychology of a young protagonist, as well as recognizing the kinds of injustices and opportunities that can transform the path of any youthful adventurer.”

Which of the following, if true, would invalidate the inversion that the phrase “flips the script” refers to?

A
The description of opulence in Hanna Diyab’s and Antoine Galland’s narratives bore no resemblance to each other.
B
Diyab’s travelogue described the affluence of the French city of Bordeaux, instead of Versailles.
C
Galland acknowledged in the published translations of Arabian Nights that he heard the story of Aladdin from Diyab.
D
The French fairy tales of the eighteenth century did not have rags-to-riches plot lines like that of the tale of Aladdin.
Solution:
Scholars initially thought that the plot of Aladdin must have been inspired by 18th century French fairy tales, but to quote the author, “The idea that Diyab might have based it on his own life — the experiences of a Middle Eastern man encountering the French, not vice-versa — flips the script.”
In other words, the story of Aladdin was not inspired by the French fairy tales but that Diyab was the actual author. By invalidating the inversion, the question wants us to not give the credit to Diyab Option 4 is negated because by pointing out the dissimilarity between Aladdin and the French fairy tales, it gives the credit to Diyab.
Option 2 is negated because even though Diyab described Bordeaux, he still saw the luxury and opulence of France.
Option 3 also gives the credit to Diyab, so it is not invalidating the inversion.
Option 1 is the right choice because, if the narratives bore no resemblance, then it disputes the evidence that Diyab ever narrated the story to Galland, as Galland claims in his diary. This would contradict, at least to some extent, the author’s claim that Diyab was the inspiration for the character of Aladdin.
Q.No: 2
Test Name : CAT 2019 Actual Paper Slot 1
Question Numbers (11 to 15): The passage below is accompanied by a set of five questions. Choose the best answer to each question.

As defined by the geographer Yi-Fu Tuan, topophilia is the affective bond between people and place. His 1974 book set forth a wide-ranging exploration of how the emotive ties with the material environment vary greatly from person to person and in intensity, subtlety, and mode of expression. Factors influencing one’s depth of response to the environment include cultural background, gender, race, and historical circumstance, and Tuan also argued that there is a biological and sensory element. Topophilia might not be the strongest of human emotions—indeed, many people feel utterly indifferent toward the environments that shape their lives—but when activated it has the power to elevate a place to become the carrier of emotionally charged events or to be perceived as a symbol.

Aesthetic appreciation is one way in which people respond to the environment. A brilliantly colored rainbow after gloomy afternoon showers, a busy city street alive with human interaction—one might experience the beauty of such landscapes that had seemed quite ordinary only moments before or that are being newly discovered. This is quite the opposite of a second topophilic bond, namely that of the acquired taste for certain landscapes and places that one knows well. When a place is home, or when a space has become the locus of memories or the means of gaining a livelihood, it frequently evokes a deeper set of attachments than those predicated purely on the visual. A third response to the environment also depends on the human senses but may be tactile and olfactory, namely a delight in the feel and smell of air, water, and the earth.

Topophilia—and its very close conceptual twin, sense of place—is an experience that, however elusive, has inspired recent architects and planners. Most notably, new urbanism seeks to counter the perceived placelessness of modern suburbs and the decline of central cities through neo-traditional design motifs. Although motivated by good intentions, such attempts to create places rich in meaning are perhaps bound to disappoint. As Tuan noted, purely aesthetic responses often are suddenly revealed, but their intensity rarely is long-lasting. Topophilia is difficult to design for and impossible to quantify, and its most articulate interpreters have been self-reflective philosophers such as Henry David Thoreau, evoking a marvelously intricate sense of place at Walden Pond, and Tuan, describing his deep affinity for the desert.

Topophilia connotes a positive relationship, but it often is useful to explore the darker affiliations between people and place. Patriotism, literally meaning the love of one’s terra patria or homeland, has long been cultivated by governing elites for a range of nationalist projects, including war preparation and ethnic cleansing. Residents of upscale residential developments have disclosed how important it is to maintain their community’s distinct identity, often by casting themselves in a superior social position and by reinforcing class and racial differences. And just as a beloved landscape is suddenly revealed, so too may landscapes of fear cast a dark shadow over a place that makes one feel a sense of dread or anxiety—or topophobia.

Which one of the following comes closest in meaning to the author’s understanding of topophilia?

A
The tendency of many cultures to represent their land as “motherland” or “fatherland” may be seen as an expression of their topophilia
B
The French are not overly patriotic, but they will refuse to use English as far as possible, even when they know it well.
C
Scientists have found that most creatures, including humans, are either born with or cultivate a strong sense of topography.
D
Nomadic societies are known to have the least affinity for the lands through which they traverse because they tend to be topophobic.
Solution:
As per the passage, ‘topophilia’ has positive connotations and evokes feelings of love, affection and a strong emotional bond. Thus, all options that talk about lack of affinity or poor emotional connect can be negated. Thus, the statements ‘Nomadic societies are known to have the least affinity for the lands through which they traverse because they tend to be topophobic’ and ‘The French are not overly patriotic, but they will refuse to use English as far as possible, even when they know it well’ can be easily negated. There is no discussion regarding ‘topography’ in the passage. Hence, the correct answer is ‘The tendency of many cultures to represent their land as “motherland” or “fatherland” may be seen as an expression of their topophilia.’
Q.No: 3
Test Name : CAT 2019 Actual Paper Slot 1
Question Numbers (16 to 19): The passage below is accompanied by a set of four questions. Choose the best answer to each question.

Scientists recently discovered that Emperor Penguins— one of Antarctica’s most celebrated species—employ a particularly unusual technique for surviving the daily chill. As detailed in an article published today in the journal Biology Letters, the birds minimize heat loss by keeping the outer surface of their plumage below the temperature of the surrounding air. At the same time, the penguins’ thick plumage insulates their body and keeps it toasty. . . .

The researchers analyzed thermographic images . . .
taken over roughly a month during June 2008. During that period, the average air temperature was 0.32 degrees Fahrenheit. At the same time, the majority of the plumage covering the penguins’ bodies was even colder: the surface of their warmest body part, their feet, was an average 1.76 degrees Fahrenheit, but the plumage on their heads, chests and backs were -1.84, -7.24 and -9.76 degrees Fahrenheit respectively. Overall, nearly the entire outer surface of the penguins’ bodies was below freezing at all times, except for their eyes and beaks. The scientists also used a computer simulation to determine how much heat was lost or gained from each part of the body—and discovered that by keeping their outer surface below air temperature, the birds might paradoxically be able to draw very slight amounts of heat from the air around them. The key to their trick is the difference between two different types of heat transfer: radiation and convection.

The penguins do lose internal body heat to the surrounding air through thermal radiation, just as our bodies do on a cold day. Because their bodies (but not surface plumage) are warmer than the surrounding air, heat gradually radiates outward over time, moving from a warmer material to a colder one. To maintain body temperature while losing heat, penguins, like all warmblooded animals, rely on the metabolism of food. The penguins, though, have an additional strategy. Since their outer plumage is even colder than the air, the simulation showed that they might gain back a little of this heat through thermal convection—the transfer of heat via the movement of a fluid (in this case, the air). As the cold Antarctic air cycles around their bodies, slightly warmer air comes into contact with the plumage and donates minute amounts of heat back to the penguins, then cycles away at a slightly colder temperature.

Most of this heat, the researchers note, probably doesn’t make it all the way through the plumage and back to the penguins’ bodies, but it could make a slight difference. At the very least, the method by which a penguin’s plumage wicks heat from the bitterly cold air that surrounds it helps to cancel out some of the heat that’s radiating from its interior. And given the Emperors’ unusually demanding breeding cycle, every bit of warmth counts. . . . Since [penguins trek as far as 75 miles to the coast to breed and male penguins] don’t eat anything during [the incubation period of 64 days], conserving calories by giving up as little heat as possible is absolutely crucial.

Which of the following best explains the purpose of the word “paradoxically” as used by the author?

A
Keeping their body colder helps penguins keep their plumage warmer.
B
Heat gain through radiation happens despite the heat loss through convection.
C
Keeping a part of their body colder helps penguins keep their bodies warmer.
D
Heat loss through radiation happens despite the heat gain through convection.
Solution:
This is a simple question. Just go through the relevant section of the passage - “…by keeping their outer surface below air temperature, the birds might paradoxically be able to draw very slight amounts of heat from the air around them…” Option 3 captures this precisely.
Q.No: 4
Test Name : CAT Actual Paper 2022 Slot-2
Question Numbers (1 to 4): The passage below is accompanied by a set of questions. Choose the best answer to each question.

[Octopuses are] misfits in their own extended families . . . They belong to the Mollusca class Cephalopoda. But they don’t look like their cousins at all. Other molluscs include sea snails, sea slugs, bivalves – most are shelled invertebrates with a dorsal foot. Cephalopods are all arms, and can be as tiny as 1 centimetre and as large at 30 feet. Some of them have brains the size of a walnut, which is large for an invertebrate….

It makes sense for these molluscs to have added protection in the form of a higher cognition; they don’t have a shell covering them, and pretty much everything feeds on cephalopods, including humans. But how did cephalopods manage to secure their own invisibility cloak? Cephalopods fire from multiple cylinders to achieve this in varying degrees from species to species. There are four main catalysts – chromatophores, iridophores, papillae and leucophores….

[Chromatophores] are organs on their bodies that contain pigment sacs, which have red, yellow and brown pigment granules. These sacs have a network of radial muscles, meaning muscles arranged in a circle radiating outwards. These are connected to the brain by a nerve. When the cephalopod wants to change colour, the brain carries an electrical impulse through the nerve to the muscles that expand outwards, pulling open the sacs to display the colours on the skin. Why these three colours? Because these are the colours the light reflects at the depths they live in (the rest is absorbed before it reaches those depths)….

Well, what about other colours? Cue the iridophores. Think of a second level of skin that has thin stacks of cells. These can reflect light back at different wavelengths. . . . It’s using the same properties that we’ve seen in hologram stickers, or rainbows on puddles of oil. You move your head and you see a different colour. The sticker isn’t doing anything but reflecting light – it’s your movement that’s changing the appearance of the colour. This property of holograms, oil and other such surfaces is called “iridescence”….

Papillae are sections of the skin that can be deformed to make a texture bumpy. Even humans possess them (goosebumps) but cannot use them in the manner that cephalopods can. For instance, the use of these cells is how an octopus can wrap itself over a rock and appear jagged or how a squid or cuttlefish can imitate the look of a coral reef by growing miniature towers on its skin. It actually matches the texture of the substrate it chooses.

Finally, the leucophores: According to a paper, published in Nature, cuttlefish and octopuses possess an additional type of reflector cell called a leucophore. They are cells that scatter full spectrum light so that they appear white in a similar way that a polar bear’s fur appears white. Leucophores will also reflect any filtered light shown on them . . . If the water appears blue at a certain depth, the octopuses and cuttlefish can appear blue; if the water appears green, they appear green, and so on and so forth.

Based on the passage, we can infer that all of the following statements, if true, would weaken the camouflaging adeptness of Cephalopods EXCEPT:

A
the hydrostatic pressure at the depths at which Cephalopods reside renders radial muscle movements difficult.
B
the temperature of water at the depths at which Cephalopods reside renders the transmission of neural signals difficult.
C
the number of chromatophores in Cephalopods is half the number of iridophores and leucophores.
D
light reflects the colours red, green, and yellow at the depths at which Cephalopods reside.
Solution:
The argument that the number of chromatophores in Cephalopods is half the number of iridophores and leucophores.does not imply that the Cephalopods are not capable of practicing camouflage. Therefore, option 3 is the correct answer.
Q.No: 5
Test Name : CAT Actual Paper 2022 Slot-2
Question Numbers (9 to 12): The passage below is accompanied by a set of questions. Choose the best answer to each question.

Humans today make music. Think beyond all the qualifications that might trail after this bald statement: that only certain humans make music, that extensive training is involved, that many societies distinguish musical specialists from nonmusicians, that in today’s societies most listen to music rather than making it, and so forth. These qualifications, whatever their local merit, are moot in the face of the overarching truth that making music, considered from a cognitive and psychological vantage, is the province of all those who perceive and experience what is made. We are, almost all of us, musicians — everyone who can entrain (not necessarily dance) to a beat, who can recognize a repeated tune (not necessarily sing it), who can distinguish one instrument or one singing voice from another. I will often use an antique word, recently revived, to name this broader musical experience. Humans are musicking creatures….

The set of capacities that enables musicking is a principal marker of modern humanity. There is nothing polemical in this assertion except a certain insistence, which will figure often in what follows, that musicking be included in our thinking about fundamental human commonalities. Capacities involved in musicking are many and take shape in complicated ways, arising from innate dispositions . . . Most of these capacities overlap with nonmusical ones, though a few may be distinct and dedicated to musical perception and production. In the area of overlap, linguistic capacities seem to be particularly important, and humans are (in principle) language-makers in addition to music-makers — speaking creatures as well as musicking ones.

Humans are symbol-makers too, a feature tightly bound up with language, not so tightly with music. The species Cassirer dubbed Homo symbolicus cannot help but tangle musicking in webs of symbolic thought and expression, habitually making it a component of behavioral complexes that form such expression. But in fundamental features musicking is neither languagelike nor symbol-like, and from these differences come many clues to its ancient emergence.

If musicking is a primary, shared trait of modern humans, then to describe its emergence must be to detail the coalescing of that modernity. This took place, archaeologists are clear, over a very long durée: at least 50,000 years or so, more likely something closer to 200,000, depending in part on what that coalescence is taken to comprise. If we look back 20,000 years, a small portion of this long period, we reach the lives of humans whose musical capacities were probably little different from our own. As we look farther back we reach horizons where this similarity can no longer hold — perhaps 40,000 years ago, perhaps 70,000, perhaps 100,000. But we never cross a line before which all the cognitive capacities recruited in modern musicking abruptly disappear. Unless we embrace the incredible notion that music sprang forth in full-blown glory, its emergence will have to be tracked in gradualist terms across a long period.

This is one general feature of a history of music’s emergence . . . The history was at once sociocultural and biological . . . The capacities recruited in musicking are many, so describing its emergence involves following several or many separate strands.

Which one of the following statements, if true, would weaken the author’s claim that humans are musicking creatures?

A
Nonmusical capacities are of far greater consequence to human survival than the capacity for music.
B
Musical capacities are primarily socio-cultural, which explains the wide diversity of musical forms.
C
From a cognitive and psychological vantage, musicking arises from unconscious dispositions, not conscious ones.
D
As musicking is neither language-like nor symbol-like, it is a much older form of expression.
Solution:
Option 1 does not question the claim that humans are mucking by nature. Option 3 strengthens the claim that humans are musicking creatures. Option 4 states about how old musicking is. It, by no means, weakens the claim humans are musicking creatures. Option 2 questions the argument stated through these lines:’ capacities involved in musicking are many and take shape in complicated ways, arising from innate dispositions…’ Therefore, option 2 is the correct answer.
Solution:
Scholars initially thought that the plot of Aladdin must have been inspired by 18th century French fairy tales, but to quote the author, “The idea that Diyab might have based it on his own life — the experiences of a Middle Eastern man encountering the French, not vice-versa — flips the script.”
In other words, the story of Aladdin was not inspired by the French fairy tales but that Diyab was the actual author. By invalidating the inversion, the question wants us to not give the credit to Diyab Option 4 is negated because by pointing out the dissimilarity between Aladdin and the French fairy tales, it gives the credit to Diyab.
Option 2 is negated because even though Diyab described Bordeaux, he still saw the luxury and opulence of France.
Option 3 also gives the credit to Diyab, so it is not invalidating the inversion.
Option 1 is the right choice because, if the narratives bore no resemblance, then it disputes the evidence that Diyab ever narrated the story to Galland, as Galland claims in his diary. This would contradict, at least to some extent, the author’s claim that Diyab was the inspiration for the character of Aladdin.


Solution:
As per the passage, ‘topophilia’ has positive connotations and evokes feelings of love, affection and a strong emotional bond. Thus, all options that talk about lack of affinity or poor emotional connect can be negated. Thus, the statements ‘Nomadic societies are known to have the least affinity for the lands through which they traverse because they tend to be topophobic’ and ‘The French are not overly patriotic, but they will refuse to use English as far as possible, even when they know it well’ can be easily negated. There is no discussion regarding ‘topography’ in the passage. Hence, the correct answer is ‘The tendency of many cultures to represent their land as “motherland” or “fatherland” may be seen as an expression of their topophilia.’


Solution:
This is a simple question. Just go through the relevant section of the passage - “…by keeping their outer surface below air temperature, the birds might paradoxically be able to draw very slight amounts of heat from the air around them…” Option 3 captures this precisely.


Solution:
The argument that the number of chromatophores in Cephalopods is half the number of iridophores and leucophores.does not imply that the Cephalopods are not capable of practicing camouflage. Therefore, option 3 is the correct answer.


Solution:
Option 1 does not question the claim that humans are mucking by nature. Option 3 strengthens the claim that humans are musicking creatures. Option 4 states about how old musicking is. It, by no means, weakens the claim humans are musicking creatures. Option 2 questions the argument stated through these lines:’ capacities involved in musicking are many and take shape in complicated ways, arising from innate dispositions…’ Therefore, option 2 is the correct answer.


© 2025 CL Educate Ltd. All rights reserved.