
SNAP Exam Analysis 2025
The SNAP 2025 exam was successfully conducted on three dates in December 2025 by Symbiosis International (Deemed) University.
The official exam dates were:
The SNAP 2025 exam continued the trend of being a speed-based and student-friendly MBA entrance test. The overall difficulty was Easy to Moderate, with Logical Reasoning and English being highly scoring, while Quant remained slightly on the moderate side.
SNAP 2025 exam pattern
|
Section |
No. of Questions |
Questions |
Marks |
Time (Minutes) |
Difficulty Level |
Doable Questions |
|
English |
15 |
— |
15 |
60 |
Easy |
12 |
|
AR & LR |
25 |
Analytical Reasoning – 15, Logical Reasoning – 10 |
25 |
— |
Easy |
19 |
|
QA, DI, DS |
20 |
— |
20 |
— |
Moderate to Difficult |
14 |
|
Total |
60 |
— |
60 |
60 |
Easy–Moderate |
45 |
SNAP 2025 Marking Scheme
Similar to the previous year's exam pattern, the marking scheme was on similar lines this year. The overall paper comprises of MCQs with four alternatives to choose from.
|
SNAP 2025 Question Type |
For Correct Answers |
For Incorrect Answers |
|
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs) |
+1 |
-0.25 |
SNAP Exam 2025 Section-Wise Exam Analysis
General English
|
S. No. |
Topic/Area |
No. of Questions |
Difficulty Level |
Description / Doable |
|
1 |
Sentence Jumble |
1 |
Easy |
1 |
|
2 |
Idiom |
3 |
Easy |
3 |
|
3 |
Filler |
8 |
Easy–Moderate |
6 |
|
4 |
Contextual Vocab |
2 |
Easy |
1 |
|
5 |
Parts of Speech |
1 |
Difficult |
0 |
|
6 |
Figure of Speech |
1 |
Moderate |
1 |
|
7 |
Passive Voice |
0 |
— |
0 |
|
Total |
15 |
Easy–Moderate |
12 |
Analytical And Logical Reasoning
|
S. No. |
Topic/Area |
No. of Questions |
Difficulty Level |
Description / Doable |
|
1 |
Course of Action |
1 |
Moderate |
1 |
|
2 |
Cause Effect |
2 |
Easy |
1 |
|
3 |
Analogy |
1 |
Moderate |
1 |
|
4 |
Syllogism |
2 |
Easy |
2 |
|
5 |
Statement Assumption |
1 |
Moderate |
1 |
|
6 |
Decision Making |
2 |
Moderate |
2 |
|
7 |
Critical Reasoning |
1 |
Moderate |
1 |
|
8 |
Series |
2 |
Easy–Moderate |
1 |
|
9 |
Blood Relation |
2 |
Easy |
2 |
|
10 |
GK |
— |
— |
— |
|
11 |
Numeric Series |
1 |
Easy |
1 |
|
12 |
Arrangement |
2 |
Moderate |
0 |
|
13 |
Coding Decoding |
2 |
Easy–Moderate |
1 |
|
14 |
Calendar |
2 |
Moderate |
1 |
|
15 |
Clocks |
2 |
Easy–Moderate |
2 |
|
16 |
Decision Making |
2 |
Moderate |
2 |
|
Total |
25 |
Easy |
19 |
QA, DI And DS
|
S. No. |
Topic/Area |
No. of Questions |
Difficulty Level |
Description / Doable |
|
1 |
P & C |
2 |
Easy–Moderate |
1 |
|
2 |
Log |
1 |
Moderate |
1 |
|
3 |
SI & CI |
1 |
Moderate |
1 |
|
4 |
Coordinate Geometry |
1 |
Easy |
1 |
|
5 |
Set Theory |
— |
— |
— |
|
6 |
Average |
2 |
Easy–Moderate |
2 |
|
7 |
Series |
2 |
Easy–Moderate |
1 |
|
8 |
TSD |
2 |
Easy–Moderate |
1 |
|
9 |
Profit & Loss |
2 |
Easy |
1 |
|
10 |
Trigonometry |
1 |
Moderate |
1 |
|
11 |
Number System |
2 |
Easy–Moderate |
1 |
|
12 |
Area |
2 |
Easy |
1 |
|
13 |
Percentage |
2 |
Easy |
2 |
|
Total |
20 |
Moderate to Difficult |
14 |
SNAP 2025 Section-wise Difficulty Level
|
Section |
Difficulty Level |
Key Highlights |
|
General English |
Easy |
No RC; Vocabulary & Grammar dominated |
|
Analytical & Logical Reasoning |
Easy–Moderate |
Mostly straightforward; puzzles moderate |
|
Quantitative Aptitude + DI/DS |
Moderate |
Calculation-based; arithmetic-heavy |
|
Overall Difficulty |
Easy–Moderate |
Manageable paper with high scoring potential |
SNAP 2025 Exam Analysis: Good Attempts & Scores
|
Category |
Attempts |
|
Good Attempts |
40–44 |
|
Good Score Range |
38–45 |
|
99+ Percentile |
44-45 |
SNAP 2025 Percentile VS Score
|
Percentile |
Expected SNAP Score |
|
99.5+ |
44+ |
|
99+ |
42+ |
|
98+ |
41+ |
|
96+ |
39+ |
|
95+ |
37+ |
|
92+ |
36+ |
|
89+ |
35+ |
|
85+ |
33+ |
|
80+ |
32+ |
|
73+ |
30+ |
SNAP 2025 was overall considered an Easy to Moderate exam with a strong focus on speed, accuracy, and smart question selection. The exam pattern remained unchanged with 60 questions to be solved in 60 minutes, making time management the biggest challenge. English was the easiest and most scoring section across almost all slots, while Analytical & Logical Reasoning was lengthy but manageable. Quantitative Aptitude, DI & DS was comparatively tougher and more calculation-based, especially in later slots.
To know more Visit Us:
2nd Floor, UTI Mutual Fund Building,
Near Ram Mandir, Near Hotel Ginger, Bistupur
Call: 999693202574 / 9102999754 / 9102990084 Email: jam.cl@careerlauncher.com